Gold stars for Thad and John...but something's amiss
When it was discovered the arraignment of Blue Lake Police Chief David Gundersen had been held earlier than scheduled yesterday afternoon, Times-Standard reporter Thadeus Greenson immediately called District Attorney Paul Gallegos to ask what the hell was going on. Thad and his reporting partner John Driscoll wrangled an interview with district attorney in the D.A.'s office, and got the scoop that Gundersen has been charged with 12 counts of spousal rape, and that he pleaded not guilty to all of them at the hearing -- as reported, exclusively, in today's story in the Times-Standard.
Gallegos told John and Thad that Humboldt County Superior Court Judge Timothy Cissna was running ahead of schedule yesterday afternoon and that's why he called the case early.
However, having written about this over and over, I think something stinks here. I'm sorry, but I get the feeling that all the parties involved -- the judge and the two attornies -- collaborated to get Gundersen in and out of court, without being seen or photographed (there were was a TV crew and two daily photographers with their cameras poised outside the coutroom earlier in the afternoon) by the media, and aren't being entirely upfront with reporters.
Gundersen is in custody. Would he not have been brought from the jail for the arraignment in his inmate jumpsuit, possibly even handcuffed? Did the judge and the two attornies agree to do Gundersen a favor and hold his hearing on the sly to save the chief further humiliation?
John and Thad, congratulations on your savvy in reporting this story. The fact that the hearing was held early, out of the public eye, led to you getting a scoop. But I hope you do some further investigation into why Gundersen appeared in court while all the media was out of the building.
Comments
Lawn Order says:
So, Andrew, having made a perfect fool of yourself with your original shoddy reporting that inaccurately blamed the D.A. for the reporters missing the hearing...
...now you are going even farther out on a limb to accuse the judge, the defense lawyer, and the D.A. of all secretly conspiring to manipulate the court schedule to trick the media.
Wow. Bold move.
Any evidence? Or just more of your hot air?
Oh well, I guess we already know the answer to that.
Posted by: Lawn Order | February 14, 2008 04:45 PM
So you are awarding "gold stars" to the reporters who missed the hearing and therefore only got the prosecution's take on the hearing and didn't get to see it for themselves.
In your pretzel-logic world, by missing the actual event and getting the information second-hand, and from only one side, they boldly achieved an "exclusive", a "scoop."
Wow, that deserves congratulations and mutual back-patting all around.
Posted by: Lawn Order | February 14, 2008 06:29 PM
The judge called the case early, because all parties were present, which happens all the time.
Sometimes the hearing will start late, or be postponed until later in the day, or rescheduled to another date. All part of life in the big city, Andrew.
Reporters have no special right to have the court tailor its schedule to meet their needs.
If they want to get the story firsthand, they have to wait around like all the other mere mortals in the courthouse.
Posted by: Lawn Order | February 14, 2008 07:09 PM
Wow, I like the pretzel logic. but for crying out loud, the plural of "attorney" is "attorneys."
Here's how they do it in other languages ... Arabic for instance ... مُحامِ ... here's how they do it in Greece δικηγόρος ... and why not Iceland ... lögfræðingur ...
Posted by: HumboldtBlue | February 14, 2008 08:30 PM
Channel 3 also managed to wrangle an interview. They interviewed both Gallegos and Clanton in Gallegos' office in front of the painting.
Posted by: Rose | February 14, 2008 09:28 PM