« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 29, 2008

Maybe local home builders should thank county government...

...for keeping them solvent. Amidst the ugly rhetoric and threatening diatribes aimed at the county’s Community Development Services Department for controlling growth, lost is the sad news that home builders in California are going bankrupt because they can’t sell the homes they’ve built in the past few years.

A major Sacramento-area home builder, Dunmore Homes, in business for more than 50 years, is going under, liquidating it assets. It soon will cease to exist, stranding those who bought new houses from Dunmore without anybody to honor the warranties on their homes. Last year Dunmore sold one-sixth the number of houses it sold in 2004. One-sixth.

My brother, who works at the state Capitol, recently bought a sparkling new home in this north Sacramento subdivision. He laments that the same model he bought can now be had for approximately $100,000 less than he paid a year ago, and that the builder is throwing in free interior decoration and landscaping incentives. Still, the homes aren’t selling.

“But the building has pretty much stopped everywhere. And the builder who built our home? One step away from bankruptcy. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see them file for credit protection later this spring. They're on half-staff anyway. And they have so many finished homes that aren't occupied,” my brother wrote to me in an email yesterday.

On top of this, according to my brother, his other home, which he bought new nearly six years ago and is now unable to sell, is worth less today than the price he paid for it in 2002. He’s basing this on the recent sale of a neighboring home, same model as his, that listed for $15,000 less than it cost new.

A home that today can’t fetch the price it sold for new in 2002. This is astonishing, given where the market was just a few years ago.

If you need more convincing the home-building industry would benefit from a little constraint, there’s this:

The National Association of Home Builders is demanding that Congress include a provision in the economic stimulus plan that would grant a $10,000 tax credit to people who purchase newly built homes. Not existing homes. But a new home that builders can’t sell. And remember, a tax credit is worth a lot more than a tax deduction, because it is a dollar-for-dollar reimbursement from the government. The building industry wants those who buy their homes to get an extra $10,000 from the government when buyers file their tax returns next year.

Think about how unjust this would be to home owners trying to sell their existing homes in this market, and to the Realtors who represent them.

The NAHB is so desperate for this outrageously narcissistic piece of legislation, which Congress has basically laughed at, it is withholding campaign contributions to members of the House of Representatives seeking re-election.

"The home builders have already cut their prices to subsistence levels," NAHB chief executive Jerry Howard told the San Francisco Chronicle.

The local home-builder lobbying groups complain incessantly, and have for years, about being held in check by county government regulators. But if you know people involved in local real estate circles, you know about the glut of homes on the local market that just won’t sell, and aren’t likely to anytime soon.

Imagine if local developers had been able to steamroll county officials and got their way, building unchecked, and right now there were hundreds, perhaps thousands, of additional new homes on the local market? With the exception of Danco – which is in a league of its own – how many local home builders would be over-extended right now, bankrupt or about to be?

Though the resistance within the County Community Development Services Department to opening up natural resource lands for housing development comes from a desire to prevent the urban sprawl that has ruined other once-pastoral Northern California counties, perhaps an unintended benefit has been to protect developers from themselves.

February 28, 2008

Stuff White People Like...

...is a wordpress blog that lightly satirizes the tastes of white America. Just going through about a quarter of the list, I found a lot of items that fit North Coast culture.

The blog is a huge success, logging more than 4 million hits (now topping 5 million) in its first month of existence, according to NPR, which is where I learned about the site created by Christian Lander, an apparently white resident of the Los Angeles area.

What surprises me is the amount of anger the blog seems to have generated at Lander.

Reading the blog further, I'm beginning to believe that Lander, who says he is a Canadian, must have spent some time in Humboldt County. Among the 77 entries so far are these topics that definitely define North Coast culture: whole foods stores and grocery co-ops, arts degrees, recycling, bicycles, knowing what's best for poor people (the entry features a pic of two Green Party members), the Toyota Prius, natural medicine, Japan (Kamisu is a Eureka sister city), lawyers, dogs, living by the water, vintage, public radio (with a pic of Amy Goodman), architecture, marijuana, vegan/vegetarianism, not having a TV, microbreweries, awareness, yoga, non-profit organizations, making you feel bad about not going outside, Barack Obama, organic food, farmers markets, and coffee.

Coming soon, Lander said in an NPR interview two days ago: blogging, under the heading of "self-importance."

February 22, 2008

Conservative former Eureka city councilman looking at Kerrigan's seat

A small item in today's Times-Standard got the attention of Eureka's progressive community. Frank Jager, the County Coroner for the past decade or so, told the Times-Standard he plans to run for the Eureka City Council seat, Ward 4, currently filled by Chris Kerrigan.

Jager and Kerrigan are hardly political bedfellows. Until the election of Larry Glass 2006, Kerrigan was the City Council's only liberal member. Jager, a conservative, a registered Republican, would represent a giant step back for Eureka's progressives if he were to win that seat. The progressives have made significant strides toward getting a voting majority on the Council in recent years, with Glass' victory over Mary Beth Wolford in the same election that Ron Kuhnel came within 30 odd votes of unseating Jeff Leonard.

Jager, who said he plans to "retire" from his job as coroner, served on the Eureka City Council from 1992-98, which raises the question of whether he can run again under the term limits law that prohibits Kerrigan from running again. I don't know the specifics of the law, but it might be that Jager served on the City Council before there were term limits and is therefore eligible to run again. It might be a question the city attorney would have to answer. Hopefully the Times-Standards' Karen Wilkinson will do some follow-up reporting on this issue.

Jager is an outspoken supporter of Rob Arkley's mega-controversial, Home-Depot-anchored Marina Center proposal for Eureka's Balloon Track. You can bet his campaign, if there is one, will be well-financed by certain local business and developer interests.

The progressives have yet to come up with a candidate for Kerrigan's seat. I've heard George Clark, former owner of Kyoto in Old Town, tossed about as a possibility, but nothing definite yet.

UPDATE: The Eureka City Charter on Term Limits:

SECTION 209. TERM LIMITS - COUNCIL MEMBERS.
No person may serve more than two consecutive full terms as a Council Member. If a person serves a partial term in excess of two years, it shall be considered a full term for the purpose of this provision. Any term of office commenced prior to June, 1994 shall not be counted for purpose of applying this provision.

Nothing in this section shall act as a bar to service as Council Member a previously elected or appointed Council Member after at least four years absence from office.

(Amended by election on June 7, 1994)

Does this part in bold mean Jager indeed can run again? The language is rather convoluted, even for legalese.

February 16, 2008

California Republican Party on the ropes

I blogged about this in December. The GOP is in trouble in California. A story in today's San Francisco Chronicle details angst within the California Republican Party organization as state's GOP convention nears.

"The registration gap (with Democrats) is widening, contributions are drying up, key posts have been left open for a year, staff is being laid off and there is a never-ending string of reports which is causing long-term damage to the image of the party," wrote Larry Dodge, a CEO whom the party owes $3 million, in a letter to GOP leaders last month.

The party can't pay Dodge, who lent the state GOP that amount in 2005 to help re-elect Gov. Arnold Schwartzenegger, and he's furious.

My brother works for the Republicans inside the Capitol , on the staff of state Sen. Sam Aanestad. The GOP is suffering from a serious split between moderates and the right-wing. The governor is the state GOP's single success story in recent years, but most conservatives consider him a RINO (Republican In Name Only). Increasingly, Arnie seems more aligned with the other side of the aisle.

I find it hard to believe that $3 million is a major obstacle for the state GOP. Rob Arkley probably has that much in his super saver personal checking account.

I do find it very telling that the Republicans can't keep up with the Democrats in fundraising. My, how the tables have turned. If major political donors are snubbing the Republican Party this election cycle, the schism in the party must be worse than I thought.

February 15, 2008

Judge's Valentine gift to Chief Gundersen: stay in jail!

Gundersen.jpg

Blue Lake Police Chief David Gundersen didn't look like this when he appeared in court Thursday to ask to be released from custody on his own recognizance, a request that Judge Marylin Miles denied. According to Times-Standard reporter Thadeus Greenson: Gunderson appeared in court clad in a red jumpsuit with his hands cuffed in front of him....

After avoiding the perp walk on Wednesday when another judge snuck Gundersen into his courtroom while the media wasn't looking, this time the man who is still the top cop in Blue Lake was on display, wearing the color of a Valentine's Day card. (Where's the photo, T-S?)

Russell Clanton, Gundersen's attorney, has a thankless job. His client doesn't seem to understand the amount of trouble he's in, if reports of Gundersen's behavior since being incarcerated a week ago are correct. According to District Attorney Paul Gallegos, Gundersen called his wife -- the alleged victim of Gundersen's alleged drug-aided sexual assaults -- while in jail and tried to bully her. Gundersen also called a registered sex offender to discuss possible hiding places, Gallegos told Miles, offering the judge recordings of the conversations. (Why is the chief getting so much access to a telephone behind bars?)

Clanton, of course, claimed that Gallegos was "misrepresenting" the intent of Gundersen's calls. What else could he say? Gunderson will remain in jail in lieu of a $500,000 bond indefinitely.

Clanton continues to insist that Gundersen's wife supports her husband. Thadeus Greenson reports that she was in the courtroom Thursday prepared to make a statement on Gundersen's behalf. But Miles wouldn't allow it. Interesting that Clanton claims Gundersen's wife says she's not afraid of her husband, but not that her husband is innocent of the 12 charges of spousal rape he faces.

February 14, 2008

Excuse us please....

....while we reconstruct this blog. We are still learning how to use this program, Moveable Type. I am working with the Times-Standard Web staff to develop a format that is more reader friendly and inviting. We should have this completed in the next day or two.

-Andy Bird

Gold stars for Thad and John...but something's amiss

When it was discovered the arraignment of Blue Lake Police Chief David Gundersen had been held earlier than scheduled yesterday afternoon, Times-Standard reporter Thadeus Greenson immediately called District Attorney Paul Gallegos to ask what the hell was going on. Thad and his reporting partner John Driscoll wrangled an interview with district attorney in the D.A.'s office, and got the scoop that Gundersen has been charged with 12 counts of spousal rape, and that he pleaded not guilty to all of them at the hearing -- as reported, exclusively, in today's story in the Times-Standard.

Gallegos told John and Thad that Humboldt County Superior Court Judge Timothy Cissna was running ahead of schedule yesterday afternoon and that's why he called the case early.

However, having written about this over and over, I think something stinks here. I'm sorry, but I get the feeling that all the parties involved -- the judge and the two attornies -- collaborated to get Gundersen in and out of court, without being seen or photographed (there were was a TV crew and two daily photographers with their cameras poised outside the coutroom earlier in the afternoon) by the media, and aren't being entirely upfront with reporters.

Gundersen is in custody. Would he not have been brought from the jail for the arraignment in his inmate jumpsuit, possibly even handcuffed? Did the judge and the two attornies agree to do Gundersen a favor and hold his hearing on the sly to save the chief further humiliation?

John and Thad, congratulations on your savvy in reporting this story. The fact that the hearing was held early, out of the public eye, led to you getting a scoop. But I hope you do some further investigation into why Gundersen appeared in court while all the media was out of the building.

Correction: Apologies to Paul

Regarding my entry below titled, "Gallegos the Sneak," I was wrong when I said it was District Attorney Paul Gallegos who snuck the Gundersen hearing into the courtroom while reporters were out of the building. According to one of the reporters who missed the hearing because it was held earlier than scheduled, it was the judge, not Gallegos, who called the case ahead of schedule.

I regret the error and apologize to Mr. Gallegos.

The fact remains, however, that the hearing was held ahead of schedule and there were no reporters from the daily newspapers in the courtroom.

February 13, 2008

Nick doesn't believe in Bigfoot

Nick is a bundle hauler for the Times-Standard. Five nights (early, early mornings actually) a week, Nick drives a van from Eureka to Crescent City, transporting Times-Standards to home-delivery carriers and single-copy machines in Del Norte County. (Apparently, the Times-Standard still sells well up there.)

One night last week, Nick was driving north past the Trees of Mystery on Highway 101 when he spotted what he described as "someone about seven feet tall wearing all black" walking along the side of the highway. This would have been between 1 and 2 a.m. Nick said it appeared it to be wearing something slick, like rain slicks. Whoever or whatever it was, was extremely large, Nick said.

Nick drove a bit further, but was so unnerved by what he saw that he pulled over and waited for someone else to drive by -- he sees a lot of the same truck drivers on this run -- to ask if the driver had seen what he saw. But nobody came, and after several minutes Nick decided to double back and see if he could espy the creature again. But it there was no sign of it.

Nick is a 60ish Vietnam-era veteran of the Navy's submarine corps. I can personally vouch for his sobriety on the job, as I work with him several nights (mornings actually, shifts start at 12 a.m.). Nick says he doesn't believe Bigfoot exists. In fact, he claims he knows some people who helped perpetuate the hoax. But he has no idea what it was he saw on the highway last week.

Gallegos the Sneak

If you're waiting to read reporting from the courtroom in the Blue Lake police chief rape case in tomorrow's local daily newspapers, you won't find it. That's because District Attorney Paul Gallegos apparently snuck David Gundersen's arraignment onto the court calendar while reporters weren't looking this afternoon.

If you don't know, Gundersen, Blue Lake's chief of police, had been in custody on suspicion of spousal rape. The story has been getting stranger with each new development. Gundersen's attorney, Russell Clanton, claimed in news stories published today that the alleged victim, Gundersen's current wife, a sergeant at the Blue Lake Police Dept., is not a complainant, but rather it's his ex-wife, motivated by a custody battle, who is alleging that Gundersen raped his current wife with the aid of intoxicating substances. Supposedly, according to Clanton, the chief's current wife was going to be in attendance at today's arraignment, and bail hearing, and speak in support of her husband.

However if that indeed happened today reporters from Eureka's two dailies missed it. Gallegos didn't put Gundersen's arraignment on the court calendar for 1:30 p.m., which is when Clanton told reporters it would be heard. So reporters and photographers were standing around the second floor (where most of the coutrooms are) twiddling their thumbs waiting to see if Gallegos and Gunderson were going to show up at the last moment. All the while, Gallegos wasn't answering calls from reporters.

When it became apparent the arraignment wasn't going to happen at 1:30 the speculation became it would happen at 4 p.m., when the late court calendar is heard. But when the reporters showed up again shortly before 4 p.m., they saw Gallegos leaving the second floor. It didn't take long for the reporters to learn that Gallegos had snuck the Gundersen case into the courtroom while they were gone from the courthouse.

It would be an understatement to say the reporters were fuming.

Can this case get any more queer? I'm waiting for descendants of Earp brothers to show up and gun it out with Gundersen's attorney.

Update (7:30 p.m. PST): Gundersen pleads not guilty to 12 counts of rape. Twelve counts? Wow. Apparently, he's still in custody.