The value of public and private sector tech leadership
I write from the Broadmoor Hotel in Colorado Springs where I am attending a major conference with court management professionals in the US and worldwide. Although this is largely a public sector (government) endeavor, we have found a way to actively engage the private sector in identifying solutions to operational problems, especially relating to technology.
I write from the Broadmoor Hotel in Colorado Springs where I am attending a major conference with court management professionals in the US and worldwide. Although this is largely a public sector (government) endeavor, we have found a way to actively engage the private sector in identifying solutions to operational problems, especially relating to technology.
We started a group called FACT, Forum on the Advancement of Court Technology (http://fact.ncsc.dni.us) in which private sector "vendors" pay dues to sit in a neutral, sales-free forum to discuss product development, standards development, education and improved procurement practices. If a Microsoft or other large corporation stepped into these discussions alone, it would be viewed as inappropriate and a conflict of interest because they sell products to courts. But if "industry" steps up and speaks as one voice, we avoid these conflicts.
I have the honor of chairing FACT and the results of defining these rules of engagement have been rewarding. Technology is a vexing problem for any organization, but especially so in government. We expect our government agencies to act with complete transparency, and that is exactly how it should be. However, if a government official can't even speak to a private sector "vendor" for fear of charges of favoritism or collusion, then governments are left completely on their own to figure out solutions. What is missing are rules by which we can not only speak to one another but actually develop standards, educate one another and define the problems that could be solved with the right technology.
Don't even get me started on the procurement process ... this is a terrible mess where government agencies often find themselves asking for last year's technology in last year's budget. There are lots of best practice examples of good procurement rules, including many from Canada. Unless we have ways for the public and private sector to discuss these practices, we are stuck with a hands-off effort that ultimately costs taxpayers countless millions of dollars.
So here I sit in a world class hotel in a wonderful city writing about something I care deeply about ... harnessing technology to make our lives better. To see this work through high level leadership in an important government institution such as courts is more art than science. And I deeply appreciate art.
Chris Crawford
www.justiceserved.com