A battle for who is the greener ...
One neighbor installs solar panels on his home to get off the grid and consume as little energy as possible. Al Gore would call this a laudable goal.
The neighbors, however, have planted redwood trees, which over the course of several years grow so tall as to block the sunlight from reaching their neighbor's panels.
Of course a court battle ensues, and some of the trees are ordered cut down. Both have pure motives, and therefore clear consciences. Oh, and one had a Prius and the other an electric car. Who is the devil and who is the saint? Or, to ask the dirty question, who is the Republican in this situation?

All of this reminds me of a relative of mine. He lives in Ceres, California (Read: hot and dry), and takes great pride in maintaining his yard despite the heat. Many hours he spends, and many gallons of water brought in from outside the area via canal and pipeline, to keep the grass green and healthy.
But a lush lawn is not enough. He orders dozens of redwood trees, and plants them around the periphery of the yard (more than an acre's worth) for privacy and "a bit of grandeur," he said.
Never once does he consider that redwood trees aren't native to the area. Never once does he consider the amount of water it will take to keep these trees alive and thriving.
And never once does he consider that the water stolen for such a use was perfectly happy flowing down a river somewhere else, a river that could have had a healthy fish population but didn't because so much of its water was wasted on fruitless endeavors such as growing redwood trees in the Central Valley.
And we wonder if the human race is doomed.