Diebold for Clinton?
Like clockwork, in the wake of Obama's defeat in New Hampshire, some are claiming that the results defy logic, and therefore could be the result of vote tampering by Diebold, a right-wing corporation that makes and sells voting machines.
Here's a link to a story that appeared in the Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel on that very subject.
To me, it always sounds like a bunch of hot air, like a conspiracy theorist's wlidest dreams come true. But I have to agree with the tenor of the article. At least with Dennis Kucinich requesting a hand count, we'll know one way or the other whether Diebold had a vested interest in Obama V. Clinton. Anyone want to bet a buck that the hand count proves the vote tally of the machines is more or less accurate?
Comments
I am pretty familiar with this process since the recount a little over a year ago. It turned out our election was both accurate and fair, but as we know the machines can be hacked. Do you know if they do a sample manual count like they do here in Humboldt County.
Posted by: Ron Kuhnel | January 14, 2008 12:13 PM
From the article: "While California does conduct such random audits as a matter of course, most states, including New Hampshire, do not. According to the New Hampshire Secretary of State's office, any recount of ballots would have to be requested by a candidate, and would have to be paid for by the candidate making the request."
So I guess that means no. I'm glad that California requires it.
Posted by: James Faulk | January 14, 2008 01:31 PM
google排名人物,google排名作品,google排名设备,google排名营销,google排名材料,平面google排名,google排名市场.综合性的google排名行业网站6787671@WOWGOLDS.COM
Posted by: google排名 | May 13, 2008 11:25 PM
杭州wow power leveling网、杭州wow power leveling公司
Posted by: wow power leveling | June 8, 2008 07:54 PM